Map of the Roman Empire - Pontus Euxinus
Pontus Euxinus
P-3 on the Map
Ancient Pontus Euxinus (Euxine Sea): Now called the Black Sea. In ancient times the Euxine Sea played an important role with many ships sailing its waters. The peoples around the Sea were the Balkans to the West, the Scythians to the north, Caucasus and Central Asia to the East, Asia Minor and Mesopotamia to the south, and Greece to the southwest.
Pontus Euxinus. (Εὔξεινος Πόντος), or simply Pontus (Πόντος). Now the Black Sea. The great inland sea enclosed by Asia Minor on the south, Colchis on the east, Sarmatia on the north, and Dacia and Thracia on the west, and having no other outlet than the narrow Bosporus Thracius in its southwestern corner. Its length is about 700 miles, and its breadth varies from 400 to 160. The Argonautic legends show that the Greeks had some acquaintance with this sea at a very early period. It is said that they at first called it ??e??? (“inhospitable”), from the savage character of the peoples on its coast and from the supposed terrors of its navigation, and that afterwards, on their favourite principle of euphemism (i. e. abstaining from words of evil omen), they changed its name to ???e??? (Ion. ???e????), “hospitable.” The Greeks of Asia Minor, especially the people of Miletus, founded many colonies and commercial emporiums on its shores. - Harry Thurston Peck. Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities. New York. Harper and Brothers. 1898.
Historical names. Strabo's Geography (1.2.10) reports that in
antiquity, the Black Sea was often just called "the Sea" (ho pontos). For the
most part, Graeco-Roman tradition refers to the Black Sea as the 'Hospitable
sea', Euxeinos Pontos (Εὔξεινος Πόντος). This is a euphemism replacing an
earlier 'Inhospitable Sea', Pontos Axeinos, first attested in Pindar (early
fifth century BCE,~475 BC). Strabo (7.3.6) thinks that the Black Sea was called
"inhospitable" before Greek colonization because it was difficult to navigate,
and because its shores were inhabited by savage tribes. The name was changed to
"hospitable" after the Milesians had colonized southern shoreline, the Pontus,
making it part of Greek civilization.
It is also possible that the name Axeinos arose by popular etymology from a
Scythian Iranic axšaina- 'unlit,' 'dark'; the designation "Black Sea" may thus
date from Antiquity.
History. The Black Sea was a busy waterway on the crossroads of the
ancient world: the Balkans to the West, the Eurasian steppes to the north,
Caucasus and Central Asia to the East, Asia Minor and Mesopotamia to the south,
and Greece to the south-west. The oldest processed gold in the world, arguably
left by Old Europeans, was found in Varna, and the Black Sea was supposedly
sailed by the Argonauts. The land at the eastern end of the Black Sea, Colchis,
(now Georgia), marked for the Greeks an edge of the known world. The steppes to
the north of the Black Sea have been suggested as the original homeland (Urheimat)
of the speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language, (PIE) the progenitor of the
Indo-European language family, by some scholars (see Kurgan; others move the
heartland further east towards the Caspian Sea, yet others to Anatolia).
Numerous ancient ports line Black Sea's coasts, some older than the pyramids.
Archaeology. Ancient trade routes in the region are currently being
extensively studied by scientists, as the Black Sea was sailed by Hittites,
Carians, Thracians, Greeks, Persians, Cimmerians, Scythians, Romans, Byzantines,
Goths, Huns, Avars, Bulgars, Slavs, Varangians, Crusaders, Venetians, Genoese,
Lithuanians, Poles, Tatars, Ottomans, and Russians. Perhaps the most promising
areas in deepwater archaeology are the quest for submerged prehistoric
settlements in the continental shelf and for ancient shipwrecks in the anoxic
zone, which are expected to be exceptionally well preserved due to the absence
of oxygen. This concentration of historical powers, combined with the
preservative qualities of the deep anoxic waters of the Black Sea, has attracted
increased interest from marine archaeologists who have begun to discover a large
number of ancient ships and organic remains in a high state of preservation.-
Wikipedia
Pontus Euxinus
EUXI´NUS PONTUS (Εὔξεινος Πόντος: the Black Sea), the sea which washes the
shores of Asia Minor, Sarmatia, and Colchis, and which was considered (as indeed
physical and geological views require) by the ancients (Strab. ii. p.126), to
form together with the MAEOTIS, part of the common basin of the great “Interior
Sea.”
1. The Name.
The Euxine bore in earlier ages the epithet of Axenus, or “inhospitable.”
(???t?? ??e???, Scymn. 734; Strab. vii. p.298; Schol. ad Apollon. Rhod. 2.550;
Pomp. Mela, 1.19.6; Plin. Nat. 4.12, 6.1.) “Frigida me cohibent Euxini littora
Ponti,
Dictus ab antiquis Axenus ille fuit.
”
(Ovid, Ov. Tr. 4.4. 55.)
It owed this name probably to the weather so frequently described by the ancient
writers to the discredit of this sea, as well as the reported cannibalism of its
northern Scythian hordes. The more-friendly title, no doubt, came into vogue
when its waters were thrown open to Grecian navigation and commerce. It is
questionable whether its existence was known to Homer, but it appears under both
names in Pindar (???t?? ??e????, Pyth. 4.362; ???e???? ???a???, New. 4.79.)
Other appellations are ???a??? t? ???t???? (Strab. i. p.21, xii. p. 547); MARE
EUXINUM (Pomp. Mela, 2.1.3; Ovid, Ov. Tr. 4.10. 97); MARE SARMATICUM (Ovid, ex
Pont. 4.3. 38; Val. Flac. 8.207); PONTUS TAURICUS (Avien. Or. Mar. 2). The Black
Sea is called by the Turks Karadenghez, by the Greeks Maurethalassa, and by the
Russians Czarne-More.
2. Historical Geography.
The principal epoch which brought the shores of the Euxine into contact with
other land, unless we accept tile account of the expedition of Ramses-Sesostris
to Colchis and the banks of the Phasis (Hdt. 2.103), was that national desire to
open the inhospitable Euxine, which, clothed in mythical garb, is called the
“Expedition of the Argonauts to Colchis.”
“The legend of Prometheus and the unbinding the chains of the fire-bringing
Titan on the Caucasus by Hercules in journeying eastward--the ascent of 10 from
the valley of the Hybrites towards the Caucasus--and the mythus of Phryxus and
Helle--all point to the same path on which Phoenician navigators had earlier
adventured.” (Humboldt, Cosmos, vol. ii. p. 140, trans.)
In the historic ages the shores of the Propontis, the Black Sea, and the Palus
Macotis, were covered with Grecian settlements. Nearly all these were colonies
of the city of Miletus alone, and were, without exception, the marts of a
prosperous trade. Although the dates of each cannot be precisely fixed, they
must have arisen between the eighth and sixth centuries before our era.
The colonies in the Black Sea were HERACLEIA on the S. coast of Bithynia, in the
territory of the Mariandyni. In Paphlagonia was SINOPE which established a
species of sovereignty over the other communities. In Pontus was AMNISUS the
mother city of TRAPEZUS On the east coast stood the cities of PHASIS, DIOSCURIAS
and PHANAGORIA; this last was the principal seat of the slave trade, and during
the Macedonian period, the staple for Indian commodities, imported across the
Oxus and the Caspian Sea. PANTICAPAEUM in the Tauric Chersonese, was the capital
of the little kingdom of the Bosporus, so intimately connected with the corn
trade of Greece, especially of Athens. On the north coast was the city of TANAIS
on the river of the same name; and OLBIA at the mouth of the Borysthenes. These
two places, and Olbia in particular, were of the highest importance for the
inland [1.887] trade, which, issuing from thence in a northern and easterly
direction, was extended to the very centre of Asia. The settlements on the
south-west coast appear never to have attained any consideration; the principal
traffic of Greek ships in that sea tended to more northerly ports.
ISTRIA was near the south embouchure of the Danube; TOMI, CALLATIS, ODESSUS and
APOLLONIA more to the south. (Comp. Heeren, Man. of Anc. Hist. p. 162, trans;
Grote, Hist. of Greece, vol. iii. p. 316, vol. iv. p. 337.)
The exchange of commodities led the traders beyond the Palus Maeotis, through
the steppe, where the horde of the central Kirghîz now pasture their herds,--and
through a chain of Scythian-Scolotic tribes of the Argippaeans and Issedones, to
the Arimaspae, dwelling on the northern declivity of the Altai, and possessing
much gold. This tract, the locality of which has been placed between the 53rd
and 55th degrees of latitude, and which has again become famous by the Siberian
gold-washings, opened up by means of the Black Sea an important source of wealth
and luxury to the Greeks. While in another direction the inland traffic between
the Prussian coasts and the Greek colonies, the relations of which are shown, by
fine coins, struck probably before the eighty-fifth Olympiad, which have been
recently found in the Netz district (Abhandl. der Berl. Akad. 1833, pp.
181--224), brought the coasts of the Northern Ocean into connection with the
Euxine and Adriatic. The amber, of which this trade consisted, was conveyed to
people from people, through Germany, and by the Kelts on either declivity of the
Alps, to the Padus, and through Pannonia to the Borysthenes. (Humboldt, Cosmos,
vol. ii. pp. 129, 141, trans.)
The Byzantines were masters of the commerce of the Euxine, and it was through
them that the supply of articles for which it was celebrated, was brought into
the markets of the Mediterranean. These are stated by Polybius (4.38) to be
hides (some assert that ???µµata, and not d??µata, is the true reading), slaves
of the best description, honey, wax, and salt-fish. The pickled fish of the
Euxine was famous throughout antiquity (Athen. 3.116), and the figure of a fish
on the coins of the Greek cities on this sea, as well as of a fish-hook on those
of Byzantium, shows what a value was set upon this trade.
The carrying trade of Central and Northern Asia, which even as early as the
times of the Seleucidae had taken the route of the Black Sea, became for the
Greeks under the Romans, and during the earlier portion of the Lower Empire, a
most important branch of commerce.
The inroads of the Goths and Huns upon the provinces of the Black Sea diverted
in great measure the Indian trade into other channels. When the route from
Europe to India by the Red Sea was cut off in consequence of Aegypt being under
the dominion of the Arabs, commerce sought and obtained an outlet in another
direction, and Constantinople became the depôt of Eastern trade.
In the twelfth century Genoa owed her commercial prosperity to the overland
trade with India, which she carried on by means of her mercantile establishments
on the Euxine.
3. Shape and Admeasurements.
The ancients compared this sea to a Scythian bow; of which the north coast
between the Thracian Bosporus and the Phasis constituted the bow, and the south
coast the string. (Hecat. Fr. 163; Strab. ii. p.186; Dionys. A. R. 146; Plin.
Nat. 4.12.)
In respect of dimensions as far as regards the: circumference, and some
transverse lines across it, they seem to have been sufficiently informed. But
though Strabo knew its general dimensions, he has totally failed in point of
form, for he imagined the: west side from the Bosporus to the Borysthenes was a
straight line, while at Dioscurias it formed a narrow deep gulf. (i. p. 125.) On
the other hand, the form as given by Ptolemy (3.10) is very tolerable. He places
the Phasis and Gulf of Varna opposite to each other, as they nearly are, and the
widest part between the Bosporus and the Borysthenes. He also approaches the
truth in the space between Carambis and Criumetopon, as well as their relative
bearings. But his Maeotis is disproportionably large. (Rennell, Compar. Geog.
vol. ii. p. 276.) Strabo (p. 124) places the narrowest distance between Carambis
and Criumetopon. [CARAMBIS]
The entire circuit of the Euxine, according to Rennell (l.c.), measured through
the different points mentioned in the Periplus, and in the line that an ancient
ship would have sailed to coast it, is 1,914 geog. miles, and which turned into
Roman miles in the proportion of 60 to 72 are equal to 2,392 M. P. It appears an
extraordinary coincidence that 2,360 M.P. should be the estimate of Agrippa, as
reported by Pliny (4.12) for the circuit of the Euxine. Other estimates in Pliny
(l.c.) are Varro 2,150; Mutianus 2,865; Artemidorus 2,619. Strabo (ii. p.125)
makes it out at 25,000 stadia, while Polybius (4.5) has 22,000 stadia. It is a
remarkable fact that Polybius, quoted by Pliny (4.12) states that the distance
between the Thracian and Cimmerian Bosporus on a straight line was 500 M. P.,
which agrees so well with the actual distance, that it proves the exact
knowledge of the ancients on this point; and that they had a more accurate
method of determining a ship's way than has been believed. The Periplus of
Arrian addressed to Hadrian contains, according to Gibbon's epigrammatic
expression in his 42nd chapter, “whatever the governor of Pontus had seen from
Trebizond to Dioscurias; whatever he had heard, from Dioscurias to the Danube;
and whatever he knew, from the Danube to Trebizond.” Thus, while Arrian gives
much information upon the south and east side of the Euxine, in going round the
north shore his intervals become greater, and his measurements less attended to.
Rennell, in the second volume of the work already quoted, has identified most of
the cities, promontories, and embouchures of rivers, that appear in the Periplus.
The area of the Black Sea differs but little from that of the Caspian. The
Euxine and Maeotis, taken together, are about 1/24 larger than the Caspian.
4. Physical Geography.
Polybius (4.39-43) has hazarded a prediction that the Euxine was doomed to
become, if not absolutely dry land, at any rate unfit for navigation. The
reasoning by which he arrived at this conclusion is curious. Whenever, he says,
an infinite cause operates upon a finite object, however small may be the action
of the cause, it must at last prevail. Now, the basin of the Euxine is finite,
while the time during which the rivers flow into it, either directly or through
the Palus Maeotis, bringing with them their alluvial deposit, is infinite, and
should it, therefore, be only a little that they bring, the result described
must [1.888] ultimately come to pass. But when we consider how great the
accumulation is from the numerous streams that empty themselves into this
basin,--that is, how powerful and active is the operation of the cause--then it
is manifest that not only at some indefinite time, but speedily, what has been
said will come to pass.
He then strengthens his position thus assumed, by stating that, according to all
tradition, the Palus Maeotis, having been formerly a salt sea conjoined, as it
were, in the same basin (s??????) with the Euxine, had then become a fresh-water
lake of no greater depth of water than from five to seven fathoms, and no longer
therefore navigable for large ships, without the assistance of a pilot; and he
further instances, as an evidence of the progress of his cause, the great bank (ta???a)
1,000 stadia long, which appears in his time to have existed one day's sail off
the mouths of the Danube, and upon which the sailors, while they thought
themselves still out at sea, very often ran aground by night, and which was
familiarly called by them ?t???, or the breast, as in Latin the word “dorsum”
was applied to the same formation. (Comp. Strab. i. p.50; Ammian. 26.8.46.)
Arrian makes no mention of this bank, nor can any traces of it be found now.
Either, therefore, the weight of water has been sufficient, at some time or
other, to disperse this accumulation which it had before assisted to form, or
the land at the mouth of the river has so increased since the time when Polybius
and Strabo wrote, that what was then a bank at a distance of thirty-five or
forty miles (a moderate computation for a day's sail), has now become an
integral part of the main-land.
This opinion of Polybius was not altogether new. Straton of Lampsacus (Strab. i.
pp. 49, 50) held the same view; indeed, he said more. According to him the
Euxine is very shallow,--was then filling up with mud from the deposit of the
rivers (????? p?????s?a?), its water was perfectly fresh, and would shortly be
choked up; and its west side was already nearly in that state.
However plausible the theory of Polybius may be, there seems no probability of
his anticipation being realised. The depth of the Euxine itself, and the
constant and vigorous rush of water through the comparatively straight, narrow,
and deep passage of Constantinople, will always be sufficient to contain, or
rather to carry off, any deposit, however large, which the Danube, the drainage
of so large a portion of Europe, or the Phasis, the Halys and other Asiatic
streams, or the mighty rivers of the North can bring down from the countries
through which they flow. (Journ. Geog. Soc. vol. i. pp. 101--122; Lyell, Princ.
of Geology, vol. i. p. 24.)
It has been thought that, at an epoch long anterior to the historical ages, the
Caspian and the Euxine were united (comp. Humboldt, Asie Centrale, vol. ii. p.
146). The physical traces of this may easily have given rise to the fancies of
the ancients connecting the Caspian with the Euxine by means of the river Phasis
(Hecat. p. 92, Ed. Klausen), or through the Palus Maeotis (Strab. xi. p.509), as
well as their traditions about the over-pourings of the swollen higher seas into
those that were lower. [E.B.J]
- Dictionary of Greek and Roman
Geography (1854) William Smith, LLD, Ed.